Students Incorporated logo Students Incorporated

Careers

A Samsung Veteran's First-Job Advice Meets a Brutal Market

A former Samsung and IBM executive says a first job was never about your major — and new 2026 hiring data shows why that advice matters more than ever.

A Samsung Veteran's First-Job Advice Meets a Brutal Market

Boonlerd Viboonkiat spent 30 years climbing from a computer engineering graduate to a Samsung Electronics vice president, and his advice to new graduates comes down to one blunt observation: almost nobody ends up doing the job their degree was for. What he told the hosts of Students Incorporated in a recent episode wasn't a motivational speech. It was closer to a field report from someone who ran a business worth roughly 10 billion baht a year and hired accordingly, and it lands differently today than it would have a couple of years ago, because the market new graduates are walking into has gotten measurably harder since he said it.

From Programmer to Sales Executive

Viboonkiat's own career is the case study behind his advice. He graduated with a bachelor's degree in computer engineering, added an MBA in Thailand, and spent his first five years as an engineer (three as a programmer, two as a systems engineer), work he says plainly he didn't enjoy. He moved into sales, and from there into running increasingly large parts of the business at IBM and later Samsung Electronics, where he eventually managed around 120 people and a unit generating roughly 10 billion baht annually. He was promoted at Samsung after just 11 months on the job.

None of that followed from his major. That's the point he kept returning to: "Believe me, most people won't be doing what you study from the university," he said. What carries over instead, in his telling, are the skills a degree happens to build alongside the coursework: problem-solving, multitasking, teamwork, meeting deadlines, the things that "really achieve things" once you're inside a company. He was equally direct about company culture: new hires can't reshape an organization to suit themselves, he said, and are better off assuming the unfamiliar rules they encounter exist for reasons, even when they seem arbitrary. Give the company time and give yourself time, was his refrain, and the adjustment period resolves itself.

It's advice built for a labor market with some slack in it: one where a new graduate could reasonably expect an employer willing to spend a year or more shaping them into the role. That assumption is exactly what's under the most strain right now.

The Market His Advice Now Has to Survive

The Students Incorporated episode aired in October 2024. Since then, entry-level hiring in the United States has slid into what the Economic Policy Institute described in a May 2026 analysis as levels last seen during the recovery from the Great Recession. EPI researchers Elise Gould and Joe Fast found the national hires rate has fallen for five straight years and dropped another 0.8 percentage points between 2023 and 2026, driven less by any single structural shift than by employers simply hiring less and workers holding on tighter to the jobs they already have, in what the researchers called historically low "churn." EPI found the pattern held broadly across industries, not just those most exposed to AI, a detail worth noting given how often that explanation gets reached for first.

The numbers get starker at the individual level. The Cengage Group's 2025 Graduate Employability Report, covered by Forbes in September 2025, found that 33% of 2025 graduates were unemployed and still job hunting, up from 20% the year before, while just 30% had landed full-time work related to their degree. Nearly half (48%) said they felt unprepared to even apply for entry-level jobs in their field, despite 89% of educators believing their students were workforce-ready. Three-quarters of employers surveyed said they were hiring the same or fewer entry-level workers than the year before, and formal degree requirements were creeping back in: 71% of employers now require a two- or four-year degree for entry-level roles, up sharply from 55% in 2024.

That detail cuts against Viboonkiat's own résumé. His pivot from engineering to sales, and the doctors-turned-entrepreneurs and engineers-turned-financial-advisors he cites as normal, describe a market where a company would take a chance on someone whose degree didn't quite match the job. The Cengage numbers suggest employers are now doing the opposite: tightening credential requirements rather than loosening them.

What Employers Say They Actually Want

Here's where the story turns instead of just getting bleaker. The National Association of Colleges and Employers surveyed employers for its Job Outlook 2026 Spring Update, published in April 2026, and found the skills they rate as most important for new graduates haven't budged: communication, teamwork, professionalism, and critical thinking. Graduates score well on teamwork. They score worse, by the employers' own account, on communication, professionalism, and critical thinking, the very attributes Viboonkiat spent the episode's second half trying to demonstrate. More than 40% of the employers NACE surveyed said new graduates' skills are closely aligned with what they actually need on the job, and another 56% called the fit partially aligned.

That second half was structured as a role-play: seven standard interview questions, with the show's co-hosts, Mia and Frank, alternating between a strong answer and a weak one while Viboonkiat, playing the interviewer, explained what he was actually listening for. The good answers had a pattern: specific incidents, named actions, a result. Asked how they prioritize competing deadlines, one answer sorted the important-and-urgent from the important-but-not-yet-urgent; Viboonkiat likened it to the Eisenhower matrix, warning that ignoring the important-but-not-urgent pile only guarantees it becomes urgent later. The weak answers, by contrast, ran on vague self-assessment and a shrug about the future. "I'm just living day by day," one said, when asked about five-year goals.

An interviewer just wants to make sure that you are really a contributor, not just a free rider.

That line, about teamwork questions specifically, doubles as a decent summary of what the national data says employers are actually screening for. The same pattern showed up on the question about handling criticism: the weak answer dismissed the entire premise ("isn't that just an oxymoron?") while the strong one described actively reflecting on feedback and working on the gaps it revealed. Viboonkiat's gloss on that exchange: direct, uncomfortable communication is a skill leaders need, not a trait some people are lucky to have. He framed it as something to practice with a boss, a peer, or a client before a small problem gets expensive. The Cengage report found that job seekers themselves increasingly sense this: graduates ranked personal referrals, prior work experience, and interview skills as more decisive in landing a job than the degree itself. Interview performance outranking the diploma is a strange thing for a graduate to accept, but it's consistent with an employer base that, per NACE, already knows what it wants to hear: evidence, not adjectives.

The Advice That Doesn't Expire

None of this makes Viboonkiat's counsel obsolete; if anything, a tighter market raises the price of getting it wrong. When there were more open entry-level seats to go around, a mediocre interview answer or a shaky first six months might have been survivable. With three-quarters of employers pulling back on entry-level hiring and fewer graduates landing work in their field at all, each of those seven questions in the podcast's mock interview segment counts for more than it used to, not less.

The advice built for a slacker market (give it time, expect to pivot, take on jobs nobody assigned you because that's how trust gets built) still describes what happens once someone is hired. What's changed is the gate before it. Viboonkiat's framing of "functional skills" versus "people skills" previews the two-part test NACE, Cengage, and EPI are now independently describing: can you do the job, and can you be trusted to do it around other people, under a boss, with a client who is never fully happy. Getting through the door to prove either has simply gotten harder than when he sat down to record.

← Back to all posts

Our sponsors

New episodes every week. Don't miss one.

Subscribe now